Case Study — Naming Strategy

Naming Meta's First GenAI Ad Creative Tools

Role
Content Design Lead
Skills
Naming strategy · Localization · Executive influence
Context

By the time I joined the project, the names for Meta's first generative AI ad creative tools — 'Image Outcropping' and 'Text Variation' — had already been finalized and publicly previewed through the AI Sandbox. Reviewing the experience, I found the names technical, hard to localize, and inconsistent with a high-quality customer experience.

The three shipped generative AI ad creative features shown with their final plain-language names: Image expansion, Background generation, and Text variations
The shipped features carrying the final plain-language names: Image expansion, Background generation, and Text variations.

Approach

I built an evidence-based recommendation using AI Sandbox customer research, localization assessments across more than a dozen major languages, Meta's content design principles, and my own analysis of clarity and consistency. I presented the findings to director-level leadership and kept advocating for the change despite timeline pressure and a competitor already using similar terminology.

Key insight

A name that's already been publicly previewed isn't a name that's already right. Reversing a public decision this late meant the bar for evidence was higher, not lower — the recommendation had to hold up against real localization data and research, not just a preference for plainer language.

Key decisions

Who I influenced

Director-level leadership
Presented an evidence-based case for reversing already-public naming decisions, and won approval to change them before launch.

Outcome

Related case study
Creative Generative AI Tools in Meta Ads Manager